Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05544
Original file (BC 2013 05544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05544
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be amended to include award of the Combat Action Badge and 
any other awards he may be entitled to.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Combat Action Badge should be awarded for his service in 
Bosnia.  The award may have been omitted or awarded to his unit 
after he was discharged from the service.

The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of 
his appeal.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty on 24 November 1992.

On 23 November 1996, the applicant was honorably released and 
transferred to the Air Force Reserve.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states the applicant did 
not provide documentation (i.e. DA Form 638, Recommendation for 
Award, etc.) to indicate that he was authorized the Combat 
Action Badge.  Therefore, he should not be awarded the Badge 
without proper documentation.  Also, at this time the Combat 
Action Badge is not an authorized badge for wear on the uniform.




The DPSIM complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 May 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
careful notice of the applicant’s complete submission in support 
of his request and we are not persuaded that he should be 
awarded the Combat Action Badge.  His contentions in this regard 
are noted; however, in our opinion, the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility has adequately addressed these 
contentions and we are in agreement with their recommendation.  
While the applicant may believe he is deserving of the Combat 
Action Badge, sufficient evidence has not been provided which 
would persuade us that he is entitled to this award or any other 
awards.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05544 in Executive Session on 24 July 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 November 2013.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 March 2014.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 2014.


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00901

    Original file (BC-2013-00901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00901 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The sixty (60) days of leave he sold at the time of his reenlistment be rescinded. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option; DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00276

    Original file (BC 2014 00276 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00276 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Combat Action Badge (CAB) be added to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00611

    Original file (BC 2013 00611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2013- 00611 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 6 January 2013, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Without validation of inappropriate track usage or a request from the commander to remove the FA, they cannot remove the requested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03460

    Original file (BC-2012-03460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After the FA he had a medical review and received an updated AF Form 469. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 November 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02906

    Original file (BC 2014 02906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating if the applicant would have provided a medical invalidation memorandum and unit commander invalidation memorandum their office could have recommended a FA removal or if he provided the fitness screening questionnaire that stated he had a medical problem that needed to be evaluated by a medical provider, it could have warranted a recommendation for a cardio component exemption. A member must notify the UFPM of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05893

    Original file (BC 2013 05893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C through F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-AIF recommends granting the Aircrew Member Badge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Missile...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02440

    Original file (BC 2012 02440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received unsatisfactory FA scores due to his marginal run times. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this case are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 25 Jul, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02564

    Original file (BC 2013 02564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; and, copies of the contested EPR documentation, an Individual Fitness Assessment History, and the medical referral for his leg condition. Lastly, DPSIM provided an advisory denying the applicant’s request to remove the applicant’s FA stating the medical documentation does not support the FA failure. However, the applicant has not provided any evidence to indicate the FA failure has been voided and as such, we find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01655

    Original file (BC 2014 01655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. Based upon the presumed sufficiency of the LOR/UIF/demotion action as served to the applicant, they conclude that its mention on the contested report was proper and in accordance with all applicable Air Force policies and procedures. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03296

    Original file (BC 2014 03296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to include the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and Basic Missile Occupational Badge. (Administratively Corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She served at Grand Forks Air Force...